Cafe of Broken Dreams by John scientific terrorist in action

Demoncracy, Who Will Protect Us Against Anarchy of Government

Posted on July 16, 2009

So far I’ve heard that without a state the world would be place full of anarchy and injustice. But who will protect us against the anarchy of government which has the monopoly on violence?

image

is 1 against 100 enough democratic

If you remember Nazi Germany, I bet that majority wanted to expel Jews then, but was that kosher?

One should be clear when the society stop being understood as the voluntary interaction of sovereign individuals but instead of as the collective thinking organism (brotherhood) then we are very close to a situation that larger, stronger, bigger part of that society starts discriminating weaker part.

Rights must be equal to all the people, and often argument if someone doesn’t like that we have special laws against him he can leave our country. But we often forgets on one main fact – private property is created voluntary but the state is enforced!  Therefore it is an aggression and isn’t the main reason of law to prevent aggression?

Aggression is anything which interfere ownership rights of individuals. Beginning by body ending by the property gained in voluntary exchange or by homestead principle only then is not committed any aggression! Idea that we will ban for example abortions is then an aggression, because an owner of a woman body is the women herself, therefore she can decide what she want to do with her own property.

I guess that anyone would not like if others dictated him, do not sunbathe, or you cannot marry this one or this one, but that is exactly what’s going on when we forbids abortion or homosexuality. We use force to prevent voluntary usage (exchange) of legally owned property (kids call it theft).

My freedom ends there where I am not willing to accept intervention of others.

You maybe have heard our state our laws, but if you accept your laws just because you are strong enough to enforce them on some area, then you should accept anyone who is same strong or stronger to enforce his laws on your land. Only then it makes a sense of non-aggression and as long as you are aggressive do not forget that I can defend myself.

Comments (0) Trackbacks (0)

No comments yet.


Leave a comment


No trackbacks yet.